Magnetic Polarity Transition
กก

The
results obtained from the rock magnetic analysis indicate that the main
fraction of the NRM at Weinan is carried by detrital magnetite. However, to
interpret the data as records of the reversing geomagnetic field, it is
necessary to establish that it was acquired at, or soon after deposition of
the loess. There are no direct ways of precisely establishing the lock-in
depth of sedimentary magnetisation and estimates vary, from virtually zero to
a
few
times the duration of a polarity transition itself. For instance, it has been
suggested that the transitional directions recorded in marine deposits may
arise from a smoothing of non-antipodal stable directions before and after a
geomagnetic reversal. To first test this extreme hypothesis, we have compared
the intermediate VGPs obtained for the MB and UJ transitions at Weinan with
the synthetic VGP paths generated at the same site assuming heavy smoothing of
immediately pre- and post-transitional directions.
Moreover,
to explain the transitional records in terms of smoothing of pre- and
post-transitional directions, the magnetisation must be acquired over a
sufficiently long time before and after the actual reversal for virtually all
traces of the intermediate field to be lost, say several tens of thousands of
years [39]. For the Weinan section this would correspond to several metres of
sediments. Smoothing to this amount would also lead to an observed duration of
the transition of the order of a few times the real duration. This is not
observed at Weinan: the estimates of 5000 and 3200 yr obtained for the MB and
UJ transitions are quite consistent with the values reported from other
studies of the same transitions.They are, in particular, consistent with the
first estimate of the length of a polarity transition obtained more than 25
years ago [40], using resuits from sequences of volcanic rocks, which are
devoid of any possible smoothing effects. It is worth noting that this value
has been confirmed by all the following studies of reversals. The recent
observation that the Blake geomagnetic event is recorded in the Xining section
is additional evidence that loess may record fast geomagnetic signals on this
time scale.
Finally,
on a shorter time scale, the presence of short-lived directional fluctuations
may also be considered as evidence that large smoothing did not occur,
provided that they do not arise from spurious artefacts of the magnetisation
or of the measurements a n d / o r incomplete magnetic cleaning in the
laboratory. The directional fluctuations between successive samples observed
at Weinan are significantly larger than possible inaccuracies in the
measurement or the determination of the final paleomagnetic direction and of
intercorrelation of the two parallel samplings. Incomplete cleaning of an
overprint acquired after the transition in a stronger field can produce large
spurious directions when vectorially added to a primary direction acquired in
a relatively weak transition field and could thus be invoked as a possible
cause for these fluctuations. If this were the case, however, the vector
differences between the paleomagnetic directions of successive samples would
be predominantly aligned with the direction of the dipole field at the site.
Uncleaned secondary components do not appear to play any major role in the
observed fluctuations.
As
mentioned above, it has been suggested that geometrical artefacts in the
construction of the VGPs might lead to a 90 กใ site path dependence which,
combined with a distribution of sites strongly biased towards Europe, might
lead to the preponderance of the paths over the two preferential antipodal
sectors. At Weinan,
the two longitudinal sectors are clearly apparent, but this corresponds to a ~
0 กใ or - 180 กใ site path distance. Therefore, this record is not consistent
with the hypothesis of a geometrical artefact, or with other suggested
mechanisms, such as an increased inclination error at low field, which would
introduce a bias towards a 90 กใ site path distance.
All
these observations tend to suggest that the magnetisation lock-in depth at
Weinan is of the same order of magnitude, if not shorter, than in the best
marine or lacustrine sediments used so far in studies of polarity transitions.
Therefore, we believe that the observed records more realistically reflect at
least the main trends of the real geomagnetic signal related to the reversal
process, rather than a rock magnetic artefact of the loess section at Weinan.
The
Weinan section provides new experimental data on geomagnetic reversal records
from a region which has been largely ignored so far. The most remarkable
characteristic of these records is the noticeable preponderance of the
transitional VGPs
in the two preferential sectors defined by marine or continental records of
reversals. The different considerations discussed above suggest that a real
geomagnetic signal is recorded, at least in the main trends, and thus
reinforce the idea that the preferential sectors may have a physical
significance. The statistical approach of McFadden et al., used in connection
with a data base considering only polarity reversals and not short events,
sustains the hypothesis of genuine geomagnetic behaviour (hypothesis
Exciting). Should this hypothesis be proven true, it would imply that the
mantle exerts a significant control over the reversal process. Theoretical
evidence does exist to support this. Notwithstanding all these points, the
sensitivity of the results to the addition of just the two records from Weinan
is a clear indication that it is crucial that additional records be obtained
from sites
outside the present preferred-site bands[PDF][PDF].